|
|
Post by Walmart on May 13, 2013 22:21:18 GMT -5
First of all I was kidding. You took that WAY to seriously. Second of all, during election time, you bar the WAD from having executive powers. That means you manage the region.
|
|
|
|
Post by Walmart on May 13, 2013 22:22:19 GMT -5
The Founder does not have as much power, yes, but he still plays an important role.
If you are not willing to give you your privilege to participate as in depth as you normally would, I will sacrifice mine.
|
|
|
|
Post by Balkan Imperial Republic on May 13, 2013 22:22:46 GMT -5
Legeslature and executive are seperate. I agree with that.
The CPE style of government is a bit more authoritarian. People are looking for less, not more. Sorry, but the CPE model won't work here.
|
|
|
|
Post by Walmart on May 13, 2013 22:22:55 GMT -5
The Senate would only represent the people. That is why the Founder is placed to monitor who is in the Senate or not.
|
|
|
|
Post by Walmart on May 13, 2013 22:23:46 GMT -5
The CPE modle does work here. I have no idea what you are talking about. Your way, which I have yet to see, I am assuming does not even cover the limits of the executive and legislative.
|
|
|
|
Post by Walmart on May 13, 2013 22:25:08 GMT -5
The Founder gives power to the President. The President finds 5 nations in the region and makes a Senate. The Founder makes sure the President didn't choose 5 puppets or anything bad like that.
The President can not vote, but can ban and eject nations when called for. The Senate then votes on Legislation and Embassies.
|
|
|
|
Post by scheinfeld on May 13, 2013 22:25:31 GMT -5
Just advising everyone, the legislature is crafting a separation of Executive and legislative
|
|
|
|
Post by This Gallant Old Republic on May 13, 2013 22:26:07 GMT -5
Seems like a shortage of popular elections to me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Walmart on May 13, 2013 22:26:29 GMT -5
Then during election time, the government calms down and the Founder bars WAD powers. People run for President and the winner gets to form a new Senate. If that Senate as puppets, it is rejected by the Founder and the President is required to formulate a new one.
|
|
|
|
Post by Balkan Imperial Republic on May 13, 2013 22:27:03 GMT -5
We should leave the legislative structure to the legislaure crew. They can write that part.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Swiss Council on May 13, 2013 22:27:06 GMT -5
The founder needs to have a balance of power. Not too much (monarch) and not too little (ceremonial).
|
|
|
|
Post by Walmart on May 13, 2013 22:27:43 GMT -5
Yes the Founder does have a balance of power! He decides what is a suitable Senate!
|
|
|
|
Post by This Gallant Old Republic on May 13, 2013 22:28:37 GMT -5
Can you please call the President 'the Chancellor' in your proposals to stick with the current title to avoid confusion?
|
|
|
|
Post by The Swiss Council on May 13, 2013 22:29:10 GMT -5
The founder should be the one executing it, while the WAD be in the legislature. The WAD does not have to have executive power.
|
|
|
|
Post by Walmart on May 13, 2013 22:29:57 GMT -5
The WAD does have power to execute power. It is give to him by the Chancellor (sure thing GOR).
The WAD can ban and eject nations.
|
|
